Newton said that every action had an equal and opposite reaction. That's all very well, but what if every action had an equal and opposite pre-action? It would put paid to the entire notion of indeterminacy. How can there be anything but the determined path (and before the amateur or even the professional theoretical physicists start in, you people still haven't actually proved anything apart from the fact that you're not really sure) be possible? Is it even possible that time only happens mono-directionally? Of course not, it is only our perception that dictates a past-to-future progression of time. Someone, please prove me wrong. Then I'd have a reason to at least make a decision, any kind of decision...as far as I can tell, it's all "Que Sera Sera". Whilst it'd be nice to be able to abdicate responsibility for fairly obvious reasons (imagine! no need for guilt or shame about the most completely selfish acts! Whatever happens is not your fault!) part of me dies when I think that no matter what I think I am doing to change things, it makes no difference to the possibilities, which are singular. What happens happens. Individual struggles, our attempts to mould anything outside ourselves (or even within) count for precisely nothing because existence, the universe, is a big pre-printed impression.
I hate these thoughts because they leave the door open for a Printer, a gigantic plate-maker in the sky.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Wolfgang and Wingman make a mighty metaphor
Skim that close to the sun
your wings might just get singed
your wings might just get singed
Monday, October 13, 2008
Apperatchikerachi
This is exactly the sort of thing those (such as myself) with an aversion to scrutiny should NOT be writing. Who reads these things? Am I being monitored by unseen agents? Angelic strangers watching over my shoulder with beatific expressions plastered across their beatific faces, writing comments both supportive and encouraging? Or scuttling functionaries of the Apparatchikerachi? Those creatures whose sole reason for existence is to ensure that no-one really lives, not properly. The servants of the public, the slavish and slaving, the unblinking unthinking minions of the masters. I'm sure they must feel their situation (o so keenly!), but there is nothing to be gained from sentimentality or mawkishness. Therein lie madness, poverty, ostracism, a bullet to the back of the brain, an unmarked grave. Treason. Disgrace and eternal besmirchment of not only their names, but the names of their children and their children's children.
Monitoring a cacophonous sea of unheard voices, all struggling to be heard above the din, these funcionaries aren't even sure what they are prying upon. Occasional words rise up from the white noise, but their meaning is disconnected, always taken out of context. Each thought expressed is an echo of something said earlier, during a better, saner, somehow nicer period in history... any originality or spark of creativity has been subsumed by the universality of the culture of equality. The logical extension of the philosophy of Big Bird ("We are ALL special! We should all SHARE!!") is that we are none of us special, and none of us have a right to anything more than anyone else. Big Bird's manifesto, like Marx's, is admirable in many ways but impossible to live by. Ego-death means death of the species, and our very DNA rails against these mad utopian ideals. When humans live only for society and it's greater good, they cease to be human and become cogs. Wheels of commerce. Cannon fodder. Apparatchikerachi.
Monitoring a cacophonous sea of unheard voices, all struggling to be heard above the din, these funcionaries aren't even sure what they are prying upon. Occasional words rise up from the white noise, but their meaning is disconnected, always taken out of context. Each thought expressed is an echo of something said earlier, during a better, saner, somehow nicer period in history... any originality or spark of creativity has been subsumed by the universality of the culture of equality. The logical extension of the philosophy of Big Bird ("We are ALL special! We should all SHARE!!") is that we are none of us special, and none of us have a right to anything more than anyone else. Big Bird's manifesto, like Marx's, is admirable in many ways but impossible to live by. Ego-death means death of the species, and our very DNA rails against these mad utopian ideals. When humans live only for society and it's greater good, they cease to be human and become cogs. Wheels of commerce. Cannon fodder. Apparatchikerachi.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)